Business & policy

Nintendo Customers Sue For Share Of Trump Tariff Refunds

At a glance:

  • Nintendo customers file a class action lawsuit seeking refunds from tariff-related price hikes.
  • The lawsuit targets Nintendo of America for alleged unjust enrichment amid voided Trump tariffs.
  • Similar refund lawsuits have been filed against Ray-Ban maker EssilorLuxottica and clothing brand Lululemon.

Background On The Tariff Refunds And The Lawsuit

A pair of Nintendo of America customers has filed a lawsuit against the company, demanding that the money the gaming company expects to receive from the Trump tariff refunds be passed on to consumers. The proposed class action lawsuit, filed Tuesday in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington, claims that Nintendo of America has made no commitment to refund customers for the money they paid to settle the now-voided duties imposed by the Trump administration. The lawsuit says Nintendo engaged in "unjust enrichment" and violated Washington state's consumer protection law.

The lawsuit comes as businesses begin applying for refunds for duties they paid to the US government as a result of President Donald Trump's tariffs on foreign trading partners in February 2025. Trump invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to justify raising taxes on goods imported from nearly every country in the world. The US Supreme Court struck down those tariffs in February, ruling that the emergency powers law didn't authorize the use of tariffs to counter national emergencies. Before the ruling was issued, the US government collected more than $160 billion in revenue from thousands of companies. One of those companies was Nintendo of America, according to the lawsuit.

Price Increases For Nintendo Accessories And Hardware

Nintendo raised the cost of several accessories by $5 to $10 in April 2025, after the tariffs were imposed, according to Forbes, attributing the price increase to "changes in market conditions." In August, Nintendo increased the US price of the original Switch hardware, hiking the cost of the Switch Lite by $30 and the Switch OLED by $50. Lawsuits seeking refunds for consumers have also been filed against the maker of Ray-Ban, EssilorLuxottica, and the clothing-maker Lululemon. Meanwhile, shipping companies FedEx, DHL and UPS have promised to pass along the money to their customers.

Details Of The Complaint And Affected Purchase Window

Tuesday's lawsuit against Nintendo of America was filed by Gregory Hoffert of California and Prashant Sharan of Washington state. The pair seeks unspecified damages and restitution for consumers who purchased Nintendo products between Feb. 1, 2025, and Feb. 24, 2026, during the period when the tariffs were in effect. Nintendo of America, a subsidiary of Japanese video game giant Nintendo, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The complaint highlights the company's decision to increase prices on both accessories and main hardware units while declining to commit to passing along any tariff refunds to consumers.

Editorial SiliconFeed is an automated feed: facts are checked against sources; copy is normalized and lightly edited for readers.

FAQ

Which Nintendo entities are named in the lawsuit and what are they accused of?
The lawsuit targets Nintendo of America, a subsidiary of the Japanese video game giant Nintendo. It accuses the company of unjust enrichment and violating Washington state consumer protection law by not committing to refund customers for voided Trump tariffs.
What specific price changes are mentioned in the article and when did they occur?
Nintendo raised several accessory prices by $5 to $10 in April 2025. In August, it increased the US price of the original Switch hardware, hiking the Switch Lite by $30 and the Switch OLED by $50.
Which other companies face similar refund lawsuits and which carriers will pass along tariff refunds?
Similar lawsuits have been filed against EssilorLuxottica (maker of Ray-Ban) and Lululemon. Shipping companies FedEx, DHL, and UPS have promised to pass along the money to their customers.

More in the feed

Prepared by the editorial stack from public data and external sources.

Original article